MICROBIOLOGY 101 LABORATORY MANUAL
EXERCISE #25: FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
NAME, ID #:_______________________________________________.
REVISION DATE: 08/04/99
Microbial contamination of food has been a problem for humans throughout history.
During most of the 5 million years of our evolution hominids ate grossly contaminated
food; food covered with dirt, chewed on by rats and mice, infested with maggots and
various microbes, rotten to various degrees etc. Clearly we are not as delicate as we may
imagine ourselves. On-the-other-hand spoiled and rotten food probably did in
a large number of our ancestors and surely made a lot more of them often extremely
uncomfortable. We are only the third generation to have the benefits of safe and secure
food preservation methods. As I've discussed with you in lecture, at 65 I can recall when
we had to depend on the "ice-man" and a wooden ice-box to keep our food fresh
and that was HIGH-TECH. Prior to the end of WWII (1945) frozen food was a rarity and far
too expensive for the common folk (who didn't have a freezer to put it in anyway). While
canning had been around since the early 1800's, its mechanism of preservation was not
understood nor was the significance of the canning temperature appreciated until the late
1800s. The bottom line is that until my lifetime a lot of people, even in the US, ate a
lot of rather bad food; stuff we would today gag at and toss in the nearest dumpster.
Maintaining a safe food supply is a never ceasing struggle. It was only since the 1930s
when a book by Sinclair Lewis exposed the filthy conditions in the country's slaughter
houses that the Federal Government began to regulate food safety. Even today there are
those who feel that our food supply is over regulated and that there is little reason for
concern about the safety of our food supply. What do you think? Many of you have worked in
the food service industry. Do you think that removing the safety rules and regulations
would result in a significant change in the quality of our food?
In the past few year the Northwest region has suffered more than its share of serious
food borne bacterial disease caused by a new strain of E. coli, O157:H7. This
virulent pathogen has killed several people and have left a number severely injured for
life. Even Pullman has not been spared an epidemic of this bacterium, but I won't name
names. This bacterium has been found most commonly in ground meats like hamburger.
However, it has also been detected in a variety of other foods including apple cider,
fruit juices and produce. Although a lot of research has been done to pinpoint the source
of this organism, it is still not known. Beef cattle seem to be one of the prime carriers
of E. coli, O157:H7, but other animals may also be involved.
The danger is such that anyone who eats poorly cooked ground meat
must be considered at risk for contracting this disease.
Most of you have been told by your mother to store foods in the refrigerator and to
wash your hands before handling food, either for eating or in preparing them. In this
exercise you will estimate the bacterial contamination in some hamburger purchased at a
local supermarket. You will see the effect on improper storage on the numbers of bacteria
in the food and you will observe how high salt or sugar concentrations inhibit the growth
of many bacteria.
Below are some microbes associated with food; some good, some very bad
characters.
Figure 1. E. coli O157:H7. It
doesn't look like a killer does it?
|
Figure 2. A fungi such as you might find on
spoiled food. The HYPHAE are the single fungi filaments. The MYCELIUM is the
total mass of hyphae. Note the reproductive spores on the end of these hyphae.
|
Figure 3. Cells of lactobacillus. These
are present in the sauerkraut you've made.
|
Figure 4. A population of yeast cells with
daughter cells forming reproductive buds. Note the bud scars left behind after
the bud leaves; the cells on the far right seems to have given "birth" to a lot
of buds--maybe it's a "grandmother" yeast!
|
PURPOSE OF LABORATORY:
- To learn the spread-plate count technique.
- To learn how to estimate the bacterial contamination of hamburger and the effect of its
storage conditions upon the number of bacteria.
- To understand the preservative nature of high osmotic pressure.
RELATIONSHIP TO LECTURE MATERIAL
- NetText: CHAP. XVIX , Food microbiology lectures.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & MATERIALS:
- Please place all appropriately labeled drawings on the back of the manual so the
instructor can identify them.
- Samples of hamburger that have been stored properly and improperly.
- Media containing a high concentration of salt or sugar.
PROCEDURE: Bacterial Counts in Variously Stored Meat
- Read pg. 83-85 in A Photographic Atlas for the Microbiology
Laboratory. Study the details of the dilution procedure on pg. 83-84 so
that you understand "dilutions" as it relates to the tubes or bottles and then
to the plates.
- NOTE: The following dilutions may not work and your instructors may change to procedure
to insure that you obtain suitable results. For example, they may supply you with a 1:100
dilution of the sample, in which case all the dilutions would be increased 10-fold.
- Obtain a 1:10 dilution of the sample of the
hamburger from the instructor (20 gm + 180 ml of sterile water). Record the history of the
sample. One half of the lab will test a sample that has been stored in the refrigerator
since its purchase and the other half will test a sample that was left out at room
temperature overnight.
- Obtain, per pair, 4 plates of count media, a 100 ml dilution blank, disposable plastic
pipettes, a spreading rod and a beaker of ethanol.
- Label the plates as follows:
- Undiluted, 1 ml, 1:10
- Undiluted, 0.1 ml, 1:100
- Diluted, 1 ml, 1:1000
- Diluted, 0.1 ml, 1:10,000
- Remove 1.0 ml from the 1:10 sample and transfer it into the dilution bottle and mix
thoroughly. This will give you a 1:1000 dilution of
the original sample.
- Place the dilutions on the respective plates. Work backwards starting with the MOST
HIGHLY diluted sample first.
- Add 0.1 ml of the sample from the dilution bottle (1:1000 dilution) to the center of the
#4.4 plate (1:10,000 dilution) and then 1.0 ml of the
same sample to the #4.3 plate (1:1,000 dilution).
Using the same pipette repeat the process with the UNDILUTED
sample to the #4.2 & #4.1 plates respectively.
- Remove the glass spreading rod from the ethanol breakers and pass it through the flame. DO NOT HOLD IT IN THE FLAME. The ethanol will catch fire. Allow
it to burn off AWAY FROM THE BEAKER. Hold it for about
30 seconds until it cools.
- Successively spread the plates in EXACTLY the
following order: the 1:10,000 plate first; the 1:1,000 plate second; the 1:100 plate third
and the 1:10 plate last. Do not flame the spreading rod between plates.
- Allow the plates to sit a room temperature until the liquid soaks into the agar, then
place them in the incubator.
- Incubate the cultures at 37oC until the next lab and then count the number of
colonies per plate. Plates with greater than 300 isolated colonies are to be
labeled TNTC (= Too Numerous To Count). Prepare a table relating the dilution to the
number of colonies and calculate the number of bacteria per gm in the original sample.
Place your result on the board with your team names under the appropriate sample heading.
Compared your results with others testing the same sample and with the results from the
other sample.
- Write down your conclusions; the TA will discuss the results.
PROCEDURE: Effect of High Osmotic Conditions on the Growth of Bacteria
- Obtain 4 broth tubes per pair with the following concentrations of salt or sugar: Salt-
0, 1%, 5%, 15% or sugar- 0, 5%, 25%, 50% (percentage by weight; i.e. for a 50% sugar
solution add the dried medium (for 100 ml of medium) to 50 gm of sucrose and add enough
water to bring the solution to 100 ml final volume).
- Label each tube.
- Inoculate each tube with 10 drops of the original meat suspension (allow the large
chunks of meat to settle out first).
- Mix well.
- Incubate as described by the Instructor.
- Estimate the amount of growth in each tube following incubation, assuming that the
growth in the control tube was 4+ and no growth is (-).
- Record these results in the table below.
- Gram stain a sample form a tube showing growth.
| Osmotic Agent |
Percent |
Growth |
| 0 |
0 |
4+ |
| SUGAR |
5 |
|
| SUGAR |
25 |
|
| SUGAR |
50 |
|
| SALT |
1 |
|
| SALT |
5 |
|
| SALT |
15 |
|
SAMPLE QUESTIONS: You should be able
to answer these questions at the conclusion of this laboratory.
- Explain why cuts of meat like steak are not considered as dangerous for bacterial
infection as is hamburger.
- What are the symptoms of E. coli, O157:H7 infection?
- What is the treatment for an E. coli, O157:H7 infection?
- How can you tell if your hamburger is cooked properly? (Sending it to a lab for testing
is not the correct answer)
- Using information LEARNED PREVIOUSLY in the course, determine how you might test
specifically for E. coli, O157:H7 bacteria in the meat so that you
could rapidly detect only a few 100 bacteria per gram?
Copyright © Dr. R. E. Hurlbert, 1999.
This material may be used for educational purposes only and may not be duplicated for
commercial purposes.
SCIENCE HALL, ROOM 440CA
PHONE: 509-335-5108
FAX: 509-335-1907
E-mail address: hurlbert@wsu.edu or hurlbert@pullman.com
OFFICE HOURS: Mon., W ed.1:30 to 3:30 PM.
TOC