NAME, ID #:_______________________________________________
NAME of TA: ______________________________
Nitrogen is one of the major #nutrients for all forms of life as it is required to make proteins and nucleic acids as well as a variety of other constituents of living organisms. Although our atmosphere is 70% nitrogen gas (N2), the majority of life forms can only utilize nitrogen in a "fixed" or combined form. The most common fixed forms of nitrogen include proteins, nucleic acids, ammonia, nitrate and nitrite. Although N2 may be fixed non-biologically, it is not a very efficient process and it is unlikely that life could exist on earth (at least as we know it) if this was the only source of fixed nitrogen. It is reasonable to assume that the fixed nitrogen that existed on earth when the first living cell (#C-prime) was formed would have relatively quickly (maybe a million years, give or take a few 100,000) become a limiting nutrient. Therefore, the first microbe to gain the ability to fix nitrogen would of had an immense advantage over the non-nitrogen-fixing forms.
Being very clever, you will immediately realize after considering the import of that last statement, that something doesn't make sense. Namely: "
If the ability to fix nitrogen is such a great thing, why don't all forms of life do it?". You all are very bright (& good looking too) to pose such an insightful question! The answer turns out to be a case of "cost/benefit" management. Nitrogen gas requires a humongous amount of energy to FIX. So a microbe that fixes N2, can't grow or do much of anything else fast because it is expending a huge chunk of its limited supply of energy fixing N2. It's like skiing without lifts; i.e., while it is great fun going down, if you have to climb up a hill after each run, skiing quickly lose its appeal, right? So the nitrogen fixing microbes tend to be found in places where little or no fixed N2 is present (which actually includes much of the earth's surface), which means that there won't be too many other life forms competing with them for the other nutrients. But when they die, their nitrogen-rich remains fertilize the growth of non-nitrogen-fixers (like you and me).It turns out that quite a few prokaryotes are able to fix nitrogen, including some Cyanobacteria (Blue Green Algae), a number of non-phototrophic free-living forms and some symbiotic forms (#Rhizobium). But how can you isolate N2-fixing microbes? To do this, you will use a technique developed by the early microbiologists for isolating microbes with particular biochemical abilities. The technique is called the ELECTIVE or ENRICHMENT culture technique. It is based on the following common sense principle. If you want to isolate a microbe that has a unique biochemical characteristic, you
provide a medium made so that ONLY microbes with that characteristic can grow. For example, if you want to catch (isolate) "bank robbers" you would hang around banks, right? So if you want to isolate microbes that eat turkey feathers or an insecticide you make up a medium containing all the nutrients except those that you find in turkey feathers/insecticide etc. and then you add a few turkey feathers or a pinch of insecticide to the medium. Now where do you find "turkey-feather/insecticide-eating-microbes"? It turns out that's rather easy. You dump in a few pinches of a rich soil (e.g. from a garden). Remember, microbes have been around for a few billion years so they have had the chance to be essentially everywhere. In this exercise, you will isolate "free living, aerobic, nitrogen-fixing" bacteria. These are bacteria that require oxygen, but no fixed nitrogen. To do this a NITROGEN-FREE media is prepared as follows:
CHEMICAL |
PURPOSE/NUTRIENT |
AMT/LITER |
d-mannitol |
Carbon source, Energy |
10 gms |
K2HPO4 |
Phosphate, Potassium |
0.5 gms |
MgSO4.7H2O |
Magnesium, Sulfur |
0.1 gms |
NaCl |
Sodium, Chlorine |
0.2 gms |
FeCl3.6H2O |
Iron |
0.02 gms |
Molybdic Acid |
Molybdenum |
0.002 gms |
CaCO3 |
Calcium |
10 gms |
Plus tap water to 1 liter.
|
The instructors will supply some roots of legumes.


A single gram of soil may contain over a billion bacteria representing 1,000s of different species. Some microbiologists have even suggested that a gram of rich garden soil might contain one of almost every bacteria species that exists on earth. While this might be a bit of hyperbola, there are clearly a lot of different kinds of microbes, Pro- and Eukaryotes, in most soils. Determining the numbers and species of bacteria present in a given sample of soil is basically a hopeless task as we currently know how to cultivate only a tiny fraction of the earth's bacterial inhabitants. However, you have to be an optimist if you are a microbiologist so this means we will try (in this case "The 'Ol College Try").
As no one medium is capable of supporting the growth of more than a tiny fraction of all bacteria, quantifying the numbers of bacteria in a soil sample is fraught with problems from the very start. The general approach to enumerating the bacterial content in a mixed environment like soil, air or water, is to chose a rich medium and assume that a significant number of the species present in the sample will be able to grow on it, even if it isn't the optimal medium for many microbes. However, one is limited by time, money and facilities to choosing a limiting set of environmental conditions (e.g. oxygen, light, temperature etc.) for incubation which clearly limits which species will grow. For example, no obligate anaerobes will grow in the presence of air, nor will obligate phototrophs (which require light) grow in the absence of light (and it must be light of a particular wavelength for a particular species). Because of the multiplicity of these limitations and restrictions, it is likely that less that a fraction of a percent of the bacterial species present in an average sample of soil are capable of being cultivated under one particular set of conditions.
In this exercise we will use the plate-counting technique in which the soil is suspended in sterile water and various dilutions are spread on a plate of medium. Subsequently, the number of colonies that grow up after a suitable period of incubation are counted and the total number of bacteria (that grew) in the original quantity of soil are calculated from the size of the soil-sample, the volume of suspending water and the dilutions employed.


Copyright © Dr. R. E. Hurlbert, 1999.
This material may be used for educational purposes only and may not be duplicated for
commercial purposes.
SCIENCE HALL, ROOM 440CA
PHONE: 509-335-5108
E-mail address: hurlbert@wsu.edu or hurlbert@pullman.com
OFFICE HOURS: Mon. Wed.. 2-4 PM.